AutomobileExpected Impact: NeutralFY2015 has been a year of recovery for the automobile industry. Improved economic outlook, positive consumer sentiments post the election of a stable and reform driven government at the centre, and reduction in excise duty (during March 2014 to December 2014) have created optimism leading to improvement in auto volumes. In 9MFY2015, the automotive volumes have grown by 9% yoy. Two-wheelers have been the biggest beneficiaries, reporting an 11% yoy growth, followed by passenger cars which grew by 3% yoy. Even the MHCV segment has improved, showing flat volumes as against a
double-digit decline in the last two years. We expect the industry’s growth to accelerate over the next two years given the better economic outlook, downtrend in fuel prices and reduction in interest rates. The government, in December 2014, reversed the excise duty cuts (of 4 to 6% provided earlier) in light of improvement in volumes; therefore we expect status quo to be maintained on this front.
The sector however will stand to benefit from indirect sops such as increased budgetary allocation for infrastructure spending (increase in road freight) and increase in income tax benefits.
Overall, we expect the Budget to be broadly Neutral for the Automobile sector.
Budget Expectations
|
|
Head
|
Item
|
Current Status
|
Expected Change
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excise
Duty
|
Small
cars, two-wheelers,
|
Charged
at 12%
|
No
change
|
Status
quo with respect to excise
|
|
|
|
|
three-wheelers,
tractors
|
|
|
duty;
impact to be neutral
|
|
|
|
|
and
commercial vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
cars and utility
|
Charged
at 24% to 30%
|
No
change
|
Status
quo with respect to excise
|
|
|
|
|
vehicles
|
|
|
duty;
impact to be neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top Picks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
P/E (x)
|
EV/EBITDA (x)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(`)
|
(`)
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashok
Leyland
|
Buy
|
67
|
78
|
0.8
|
2.8
|
80.5
|
23.8
|
20.1
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hero
Motocorp
|
Accumulate
|
2,853
|
3,242
|
131.4
|
159.3
|
21.7
|
17.9
|
14.2
|
11.4
|
|
BankingExpected Impact: PositiveIn January 2015, the RBI started the rate-cutting cycle with a 25bp cut due to structural downward movement in inflation. Further rate cuts also depend on the government sticking to fiscal consolidation targets. We do expect the government to meet the fiscal deficit target in this budget, which is expected to provide room for further monetary easing by the RBI. Moreover, the usual measures to encourage savings and investments, such as increase investment limits and home loan limits for tax breaks to individuals, are expected in this budget too.
PSU banks are facing capital constraints, requiring an estimated `15,400cr of capital to increase Common Equity Tier1 (CET 1) to even the bare 8% level. Newly adopted criteria for capital infusion on the basis of a bank’s efficiency in performance is a step in the right direction. More measures that target efficiency
improvement in PSU banks would be watched out for. Also, on the off-chance that a structural roadmap for possible consolidation or reduction of government stake in PSU banks is announced, that could be a significant structural re-rating trigger for PSU banks.
The key issue for PSU banks is the huge pile-up of NPAs and restructured loans. Up to 75-80% of all restructured loans are stemming from problem sectors like metals & mining, infra & engineering, textiles and chemicals/bulk drugs. Government measures to revive these sectors that can accelerate recovery of
NPAs, would be a major positive that could come out of this budget for PSU banks.
Overall, we expect Budget to be positive for the Banking Sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Expected Change
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-saving fixed deposits
|
5-year lock-in period
|
3-year lock-in period
|
Positive
for banks
|
|
Life
Insurance, Mutual
|
`1.5lakh
investment limit
|
`2lakh
investment limit
|
Positive
for Max India, Reliance Capital, etc.
|
|
Funds
|
|
|
|
|
Home
Loans
|
Tax
deduction available on interest
|
Further
increase in limits
|
Positive
for banks and housing finance
|
|
|
and
principle repayment of home
|
|
companies
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviving problem sectors
|
Metals, infra, textiles, chemicals
|
Revival measures/reforms such
|
Visibility on improvement of asset
quality
|
|
of
the economy
|
account
for 75-80% of restructured
|
as
accelerated auctions, land
|
would
be a significant positive for PSU banks
|
|
|
loans
|
acquisition,
anti-dumping duties
|
|
|
|
|
to
protect against imports, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital infusion in PSU
|
`15,400cr shortage just for taking
|
Recapitalising bank; structural
|
Positive for PSU banks
|
|
banks
+ structural
|
CET
1 capital adequacy to 8%.
|
reforms
for improving efficiency
|
|
|
reforms
encouraging
|
Structural
operating inefficiencies &
|
|
|
|
efficiency/consolidation
|
lack
of continuity of top
|
|
|
|
|
management,
etc.
|
|
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
PE (x)
|
P/ABV (x)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(`)
|
(`)
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
|
Axis
Bank
|
Buy
|
581
|
686
|
31.3
|
37.1
|
18.6
|
15.7
|
3.1
|
2.7
|
|
Canara
Bank
|
Buy
|
417
|
482
|
61.8
|
76.1
|
6.7
|
5.5
|
0.8
|
0.7
|
|
SBI
|
Accumulate
|
307
|
345
|
18.2
|
24.0
|
16.9
|
12.8
|
1.9
|
1.7
|
|
Yes
Bank
|
Buy
|
835
|
1,031
|
48.8
|
60.7
|
17.1
|
13.8
|
3.0
|
2.5
|
Capital GoodsExpected Impact: PositiveThe Capital goods industry has been suffering due to lack of investment across various sectors, thus resulting in slowing industrial growth. The macro environment too has been challenging. However, with the launch of the ‘Make in India’ campaign and related structural announcements, we expect the government to pave way for private sector capex revival.
In order to encourage investment cycle, the government has increased FDI limits (1) across most of the rail infrastructure sub-segments to 100%, and (2) to 49% in the defense sectors from 26% earlier.
The government recently passed the land acquisition ordinance and is working on setting-up single-window clearance for all infrastructure projects. With the government focusing on addressing land acquisition and clearance related issues, we are of the view that a favorable ecosystem for the ‘Make in India’ campaign is emerging.
Additionally, fund allocation to various programs including the R-APDRP and RGGVY would continue to provide a fillip to the transmission line players. We also expect more funding towards water treatment, railways, and the defense segment.
Favorable announcements towards manufacturing and a conducive Infra policy would also lead to revival
in demand for capital good players.
Overall, we expect the Budget to be Positive for the Capital Goods sector.
Budget Expectations
|
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
|
Expected Change
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
Allocation for
|
Funds
are being allocated for Fund allocation expected to
|
It
will be positive for various transmission line players, as it
|
|
|
T
& D.
|
various
programs including
|
continue.
|
|
provides
a continuing business opportunity. This will be
|
|
|
|
the
APDRP and RGGVY.
|
|
|
positive
for stocks like KEC, Kalpataru Power, Jyoti Structure,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
Alstom T&D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improving
the
|
-
|
|
Improve
rail connectivity,
|
It
will be positive for various rail infra players, as it provides a
|
|
|
infrastructure
of
|
|
|
electrify
the existing rail
|
continuing
business opportunity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railways
|
|
|
network,
modernize tracks,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fund
new wagon purchase and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
improve
safety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promote
Domestic
|
-
|
|
Exemptions and incentives for
|
It
will be positive for capital goods companies manufacturing
|
|
|
Defense
manufacturing
|
|
|
domestic
defense
|
defense
equipment like Bharat Electricals and Bharat Forge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
manufacturing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
allocation for
|
One
of the most important
|
We
expect fund allocation to
|
It will be positive for companies who are into water
|
|
|
|
|
water
resources and
|
projects
of this ruling
|
increase
for this NAMAMI
|
desalination,
and waste & sewage water treatment segment.
|
|
|
cleaning
of Ganga
|
government.
In the last
|
Ganga
project.
|
|
Among
the companies to benefit on this account would be VA
|
|
|
|
budget,
the government
|
|
|
Tech
Wabag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
allotted `2,047cr for this
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
PE (x)
|
P/ABV (x)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(`)
|
(`)
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
|
Crompton Greaves
|
Buy
|
174
|
220
|
6.7
|
10.3
|
26.8
|
17.3
|
15.0
|
11.0
|
CementExpected Impact: PositiveThe Cement industry is expected to grow at the rate of 6-8% during FY2015 though on a lower base of the previous year as cement demand grew by just 3% during FY2014. The price increase taken by cement manufacturers during 1HFY2015 could not be sustained due to lack of demand. We expect cost pressure to remain benign due to fall in the prices of key commodities, ie. of coal and crude oil. This would stabilize the profitability of cement manufacturers.
The large savings accrued by the government on account of lower subsidy burden due to fall in crude prices could be used for infrastructure development. The cement sector expects fund allocation to increase towards infrastructure projects such as roads, freight corridor, 100 smart cities, and housing for all etc, which would boost cement demand. The housing construction segment constitutes 65-67% of the total
cement demand; hence allocating funds for schemes like 100 smart cities and housing for all will provide the much need boost to the cement demand.
Overall we expect the Budget to be Positive for the Cement sector.
Budget Expectations
|
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Expectation
|
|
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure
|
Government aims to increase
spending
|
Announcement
|
of
|
major
|
Announcement on new infrastructure
projects would be
|
|
|
|
spending
|
on
infrastructure to revive econommic
|
infra
|
projects
|
related to
|
positive
as it would boost cement demand.
|
|
|
|
|
growth
|
highways, freight
corridors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
smart cities, housing for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
all,
and irrigation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excise duty
on
|
As per the current duty structure,
excise
|
No change
|
|
|
Status quo with respect to excise
duty on cement will be
|
|
|
|
cement
|
duty
on cement plants is 12%, along
|
|
|
|
|
a
positive for the sector.
|
|
|
|
|
with additional
charge of `120/ton.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
duty will be charged on the retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selling
price with an abatement of 30%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rail
Fare
|
Freight
fares were hiked by 6.5% in the
|
Expect
|
price
|
to
|
remain
|
Neutral
for cement industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last budget (highest rise in the
last 15
|
unchanged due to sharp fall
|
|
|
|
|
|
years)
|
in
crude prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
P/E (x)
|
EV/EBITDA (x)
|
|
|
|
(`)
|
(`)
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JK
Lakshmi Cement
|
Buy
|
384
|
443
|
14.6
|
18.3
|
26.1
|
20.9
|
13.2
|
9.1
|
|
Mangalam
Cement
|
Buy
|
283
|
361
|
9.6
|
20.5
|
30.6
|
14.4
|
10.4
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMCG
Expected Impact: NeutralA significant amount of revenue of the FMCG industry comes from the rural market. Rural markets have undergone a slowdown in the past few quarters due to lower income of rural households. This has been owing to lower crop output due to deficient monsoon and due to lower hike in MSP which has impacted rural discretionary spending. In the upcoming budget, the FMCG sector would be hoping for announcements that would boost demand such as lowering of personal taxes, etc which would boost disposable incomes in the hands of consumers. Apart from this, the industry is expecting a clear roadmap with regards GST implementation. However, based on the recent government spending pattern, lower allocation towards social schemes could restrict rural spending. This could affect the growth prospects of FMCG companies which are highly dependent on rural markets.
Overall, we expect the Budget to be Neutral for the FMCG sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
|
|
Expectation
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction
in rural
|
Higher
allocation to social
|
lower
yoy allocation towards
|
Negative
for the entire sector as rural spending pattern
|
|
spending
|
schemes
like NREGS, Indira
|
social
schemes
|
would
be under pressure. FMCG companies with higher
|
|
|
Gandhi
Vikas Yojana
|
|
|
dependency
on rural markets including Dabur, Marico,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Godrej
Consumer, HUL, Emami, etc would be impacted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the
most.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excise
duty on cigarettes
|
Duty
varies as per the length
|
Hike
expected to be marginal
|
Every
year government is taking excise duty hike on
|
|
|
of
the cigarette sticks
|
|
|
cigarettes
and we expect a marginal hike in excise duty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in
the forthcoming budget as well. The same is not likely
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
impact ITC as it would pass on the hike to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
customer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GST
Implementation
|
Multiple taxes such as excise
|
Concrete
announcement
|
Implementation
of GST would result in uniform taxation
|
|
|
duty charged
|
by
|
Union
|
regarding
GST
|
for
products and services across the country and also do
|
|
|
Government
|
and
|
Value
|
|
away
with the cascading effect of tax. GST would also
|
|
|
Added Tax (VAT) charged by
|
|
result
in reducing the overall tax burden on products
|
|
|
state
governments
|
|
|
and
services, thereby propelling demand.
|
InfrastructureExpected Impact: PositiveIn the last few years, the entire Infra sector had been impacted due to slow-down in capex cycle, leading to a decline in order books. The sector faced delays in getting requisite clearances (resulting in time and cost over-runs), policy paralysis, higher interest rates, and stretched balance sheets. As a result, the bottom-line shrunk for most of the Infra companies. After the new government came into power at the centre in 2014, Infra stocks witnessed a strong run-up, with some of them outperforming the broader markets. This run-up was on expectation of major reforms and favorable policy changes.
New project launches were muted in 2014, owing to delays in getting clearances and impending structural issues surrounding the respective sub-sectors. Sensing urgency to address key issues, the new government went ahead with an ordinance amending the Land Acquisition Act, and is now working on setting-up a single window for granting clearances. These two initiatives depict the government’s inclination to address
the two big challenges, land acquisition and getting EC, which are currently coming in way of take-off of large Infra projects.
The recent crash in oil prices, upcoming spectrum auction, and ongoing PSU divestment, pave way for the
government to initiate higher Infra spending. Hence, the government would focus on higher allocation towards flagship programs of Bharat Nirman, JNNURM, APDRP, AIBP and NHDP. Besides higher allocation towards the sector, to encourage higher investor participation, the budget could announce tax breaks for Infra Investment Trusts (InvITs). Further, some tax breaks and incentives could be announced for the Construction companies as well.
Overall, we expect the Budget to be Positive for the Infrastructure Sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Wish List
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&C
cos to get incentives
|
N.A.
|
|
This
could encourage higher participation by E&C
|
|
for
construction of group
|
|
|
segment
towards Group & Rural Housing
|
|
housing
& rural homes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extend Sec 80-IA benefits
|
N.A.
|
|
This
could lead to private sector capex revival and help
|
|
to
upgrade/ extend any
|
|
|
E&C
players grow their Order Books
|
|
existing
Infra facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAT
on Infra players
|
Currently
levied @20%
|
Abolish
it
|
Infra
players would save on tax outgo, and would lead
|
|
|
|
|
to
betterment of their financial health. Projects would get
|
|
|
|
|
attractive.
Also, this would encourage Infra capex
|
|
|
|
|
revival.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exempt Income by way of
|
No exemption available
|
Restoration of exemption
|
Would open-up one more avenue for
lower cost of
|
|
Dividends
(other than
|
|
under
section 10 (23G)
|
capital,
helpful in fund raising.
|
|
dividends
u/s 115-O)/
|
|
|
|
|
interest/
long-term CG of
|
|
|
|
|
Infra
Cap Fund/ Infra
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Co. across
|
|
|
|
|
approved
eligible
|
|
|
|
|
businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased
allocation to
|
Current
infra spend is ~5-
|
Take
Infra spending to
|
Will
lead to capex revival and help Indian economy
|
|
the
sector
|
6.0%
of GDP, much below
|
8-9%
of GDP
|
achieve
8+%-plus growth
|
|
|
the
requirement
|
|
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
P/E (x)
|
EV/EBITDA (x)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(`)
|
(`)
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
|
L&T
|
Accumulate
|
1,662
|
1,855
|
50.6
|
56.7
|
32.8
|
29.3
|
25.6
|
22.7
|
|
MBL
Infra
|
Buy
|
427
|
561
|
40.9
|
48.5
|
10.4
|
8.8
|
7.4
|
6.7
|
ITExpected Impact: PositiveUnion Budget 2015-16 is likely to be positive for the Indian IT sector. Some of the expectations are as follows-
a) GST: Clarity on place of supply rules- While the government has floated a bill for common Goods and Service Tax (GST) across the country last month, contemplations appear with respect to various aspects of GST design, including price and threshold exemptions. Since the rules are yet to be released in the public, the industry is also unclear whether the tax is to be levied based on the state where a company branch is located or where its headquarters are based.
b) Relief from double taxation on software-The government in its previous budget failed to provide any relief from multiple levels of taxes: sales tax/VAT, CVD/excise duty and service tax on procurement of new software. This comes as a major hindrance for organizations in the country to buy original software. It is expected that the upcoming budget must ensure a simplified tax regime to relieve the burden of exorbitant taxes on this account.
Overall, we expect the Budget to be positive for the IT Sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Wish List
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GST
|
Yet
to be implemented
|
Clarity
on- location of levy of
|
Will
be positive for the sector
|
|
|
|
taxes,
GST design including
|
|
|
|
|
price
and threshold exemptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relief from double
|
Multiple levels of taxes-
|
Relief from multiple levels of
|
Positive for the sector
|
|
taxation
on software
|
sales
tax/VAT, CVD/excise
|
taxes
|
|
|
|
duty
and service tax on
|
|
|
|
|
procurement
of new
|
|
|
|
|
software.
|
|
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
P/E (x)
|
EV/EBITDA (x)
|
|
Infosys
|
Accumulate
|
82
|
113
|
10.9
|
10.1
|
7.5
|
8.1
|
4.8
|
4.4
|
|
TCS
|
Buy
|
996
|
1,110
|
95.8
|
110.7
|
10.4
|
9.0
|
9.4
|
8.6
|
MediaExpected Impact: PositveAccording to FICCI, the Indian media and entertainment sector is expected to post a strong CAGR of 14.2% through CY2012-18 to `1,78,600cr on the back of growth in regional markets, digitization push and strength in the film sector, and fast increasing new media businesses. Going forward, we believe that radio would be a high growth segment for the industry owing to the upcoming Phase 3 Radio auction which has already been approved by the cabinet (~839 radio stations expected across 227 new cities). In the upcoming budget, the media industry is hoping for announcements with regards exemption of import
duty on setup boxes and on capital equipment for Radio broadcasting, tax holiday of 5 years for new capital investment in Phase III, and uniformity in taxation under the GST.
We expect the Budget to be positive for the Media Sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Expectation
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phase
III of Digitization:
|
-
|
Initial
years of business are not
|
Beneficial
for all the Radio broadcasting companies
|
|
Provide
tax holiday of 5
|
|
profitable.
So hoping for some tax
|
like
ENIL and companies like HT Media, DB Corp
|
|
years
for new capital
|
|
benefit
from the government.
|
etc
who have radio subsidiaries.
|
|
investment
in Phase III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Duty: Reduce
|
-
|
Expected to reduce upto 4%.
|
Beneficial for all the Radio
broadcasting companies
|
|
customs
duty on capital
|
|
|
like
ENIL and companies like HT Media, DB Corp
|
|
equipment
for Radio
|
|
|
etc
who have radio subsidiaries.
|
|
broadcasting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Import duty on set top
|
The set top boxes are
|
Removal of import duty
|
Removal of import duty on set up
boxes would
|
|
boxes
|
subject
to a import duty of
|
|
reduce
cost burden on DTH and cable companies,
|
|
|
5%
|
|
facilitating rapid digitization. Positive for DTH and
|
|
|
|
|
cable
industry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uniformity in taxation
|
Entertainment tax levied
|
Roadmap for implementation of
|
Positive for multiplexes a
uniformity is created in the
|
|
under
GST
|
by
various states at
|
GST
|
tax
structure instead of multiple taxes
|
|
|
different
rates
|
|
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
P/E (x)
|
EV/EBITDA (x)
|
|
Jagran
Prakashan
|
Buy
|
136
|
156
|
7.7
|
8.3
|
17.8
|
16.3
|
9.1
|
8.2
|
|
HMVL
|
Buy
|
225
|
292
|
17.8
|
19.2
|
12.7
|
11.7
|
7.6
|
6.7
|
Metals & MiningExpected Impact: PositiveWe expect the government to likely increase import duty on steel, in view of the increasing steel imports from China and Russia. Total steel imports in India during 9MFY2015 have increased 57.5% yoy, led by a slowdown in the Chinese economy, steep depreciation in Russian Rouble and free trade agreement with Korea. The Steel Ministry is also seeking a waiver of the 2.5% import duty on all its raw materials such as iron ore, coking coal, limestone, dolomite and scrap. We do not believe this is likely.
The government may however look to reduce the export duty on low grade (<58% fe) iron ore fines, as Indian steel-makers do not use these low-grade iron ore fines for making steel. We believe based on the recommendation of the Mines And Steel Minister, the government may give a differential treatment to the export of low grade iron ore fines.
We believe a thrust to the infrastructure sector and steps to revive the investment cycle would in general be positive for the metals/mining sector.
Overall, we expect the Budget to be Positive for Metal companies.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Expected change
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Import
duty on steel
|
7.5%
on flat products, 5%
|
Increase
to 10%
|
Positive
for domestic steel players such as JSW Steel,
|
|
|
on
long products
|
|
Tata
Steel, Sail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export duty on iron ore
|
30% duty on lumps
|
Decrease in duty for
|
Positive for iron ore exporters
such as Sesa Sterlite.
|
|
|
and
fines
|
low-grade
fines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waiver of import duty on
|
2.5% on iron ore, coking
|
No change
|
Neutral for metal/mining
companies.
|
|
raw
materials
|
coal,
limestone and scrap
|
|
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
P/E (x)
|
EV/EBITDA (x)
|
|
JSW
Steel
|
Buy
|
990
|
1165
|
81.3
|
72.2
|
12.2
|
13.7
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
|
Tata
Steel
|
Buy
|
367
|
458
|
31.4
|
37.3
|
11.7
|
9.8
|
6.9
|
6.3
|
Oil & GasExpected Impact: PositiveFalling crude prices have resulted in lower under-recoveries and working capital requirements for oil marketing companies (OMC). However, it has affected the profitability of upstream companies such as ONGC and OIL.
We expect budgetary measures to be focused on providing clarity on the subsidy sharing formula for oil companies. The oil ministry has proposed a new subsidy sharing proposal by which upstream companies would not make any contributions towards subsidy burden if crude prices are at or below $60 per barrel, would bear 85% subsidy burden when crude oil prices exceed $60 a barrel and is less than or equal to $100 a barrel, and would bear 90% subsidy burden if crude oil price exceeds $100 per barrel. A concrete subsidy sharing formula would provide visibility over earnings of upstream oil companies and hence, it would be positive for them (ONGC, Oil India and GAIL).
The government is also likely to re-introduce 2.5-5% customs duty on import of crude oil, which will be positive for Cairn India and negative for private refiners and OMCs.
We expect the budget to be Positive for the upstream companies and negative for OMCs.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Expected Change
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidy
sharing by
|
Lack
of clarity over
|
Subsidy
burden for oil companies
|
Positive
for ONGC, OIL, GAIL
|
|
upstream
companies and
|
subsidy
sharing
|
may
be reduced as crude prices are
|
|
|
OMCs
|
mechanism
by OMCs,
|
expected
to remain low and the
|
|
|
|
upstream
companies,
|
government
is looking to divest
|
|
|
|
and
government
|
stakes
in upstream PSUs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customs duty on crude oil
|
No customs duty
|
Introduction of 2.5-5% customs
duty
|
Positive for Cairn India. Negative
for OMCs and
|
|
|
currently
|
on
crude oil
|
private
refiners (Reliance)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
P/E (x)
|
EV/EBITDA (x)
|
RIL
|
Buy
|
917
|
1,034
|
75.5
|
81.5
|
12.2
|
11.2
|
9.5
|
8.3
|
PharmaceuticalsExpected Impact: PositiveThe Union Budget 2015-16 is likely to be positive for the pharmaceutical sector. Apart from continued increased allocation towards healthcare, other demands by the sector are:
a) Weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB) for computing book profits: Presently, while computing the 'book profit' under Section 115JB, the amount of weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB) is not deducted. In order to promote in-house R&D in India, the amount of weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Act should be deducted while computing book profit for the purpose of MAT.
b) Clinical Trials - Weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB): Weighted Deduction u/s 35(2AB) should be enhanced from the existing 200% to 250% for a period of next 10 years, ie up to 31st March, 2024. The current provisions for deduction u/s 35(2AB) cover only expenditure incidental to research carried on at the in-house R&D facility. As clinical trials are specialized and expensive most, R&D facilities outsource these trials. Hence, in order to successfully launch any new drug, the innovator has to get the clinical trial done outside approved facilities within India and abroad.
Overall, we expect the Budget to be Positive for the Pharmaceutical Sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Expectation
|
Potential Impact
|
|
Weighted
deduction
|
Presently,
while computing
|
In
order to promote in-house
|
Positive
for all pharma companies.
|
|
under
Section 35(2AB)
|
the
'book profit' under
|
R&D
in India, the amount of
|
|
|
for
computing book
|
Section
115JB, the amount
|
weighted
deduction under
|
|
|
profits
|
of
weighted deduction
|
section
35(2AB) of the Act
|
|
|
|
under
Section 35(2AB) is not
|
should
be deducted while
|
|
|
|
deducted.
|
computing
book profit for the
|
|
|
|
|
purpose
of MAT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R&D expenditure tax
|
Currently 200%.
|
Weighted Deduction u/s
|
Positive for all pharma companies.
|
|
deductions
|
|
35(2AB)
should be enhanced
|
|
|
|
|
from
the existing 200% to 250%
|
|
|
|
|
for
a period of next 10 years, ie
|
|
|
|
|
up
to 31st March, 2024.
|
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
P/E (x)
|
EV/EBITDA (x)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPCA
Labs
|
|
(`)
|
(`)
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
FY2015E
|
FY2016E
|
|
|
Buy
|
681
|
817
|
24.1
|
44.7
|
28.2
|
15.3
|
18.3
|
10.5
|
|
|
Dr
Reddy’s Labs
|
Buy
|
3,336
|
3,878
|
149.0
|
184.7
|
22.4
|
18.1
|
16.3
|
13.3
|
|
PowerExpected Impact: PositiveThe government has set an ambitious target of 100GW of solar power and 60GW of wind energy by 2022, with an estimated investment of $200bn. In line with these targets, we expect the government to promote the renewable energy sector by extending various tax incentives.
Power producers are forced to import coal, as domestic supply is insufficient to meet their requirement. They have therefore sought exemption of Basic Customs Duty (BCD) and Countervailing Duty (CVD) of 2% each. They also seek exemption of customs duty on fly ash for a power plant set up in a SEZ. We believe any reduction in duties would be positive for power producers.
We expect the budget to be Positive for the Power Sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Expected
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction
in Basic
|
Coal
imports attract 2% BCD
|
Possible
exemption of BCD and
|
Positive
for domestic power producers
|
|
Customs
Duty (BCD) and
|
and
CVD each.
|
CVD
on imported coal.
|
|
|
Countervailing
Duty
|
|
|
|
|
(CVD)
on coal imports
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
Expected Impact: NeutralThe Real Estate sector has faced a slump in the past one year period, as volume absorption (reflecting demand) in India’s top seven cities has either been flat or declined on a yoy basis. Muted growth in bank lending towards the sector has also led to the slowdown, creating liquidity crunch for many of the developers. After the new government came into power at the centre in 2014, real estate prices across top 7 cities have witnessed single digit gains. We are of the view that it is the absorption and not price appreciation which would drive the residential segment growth, going forward. Absorption of New
launches in recent times has not been up to expectations, despite developers launching the projects at 10-15% discount to the ongoing market rates; due to higher interest rates and a weak demand cycle. Further, barring a few pockets, higher inventory continues to hamper recovery in commercial real estate markets. We expect rental trends to remain in the northward direction for the next 12-15 months.
For the upcoming Union Budget, we expect the government to increase the tax limit under Sec 80c from
`1lakh to `3lakhs, which will lend a boost to the housing segment. Re-introduction of tax holiday for housing projects under Sec 80-IB and relaxation of end-use restrictions on the use of External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs) is on the developers’ wish list. Further, tax benefits or appropriate subsidies for promoting green projects also appear in their wish list.
Overall, we do not expect these measures to have a significant near-term impact on our estimates. Hence, we expect the Budget to be Neutral for the Real Estate Sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Expected
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
clarity on Dividend
|
No
clarity
|
Abolish
DDT on distribution of
|
This
could make REITs attractive. Developers like
|
|
Distribution
Tax (DDT)
|
|
dividends
by SPVs to REITs
|
DLF,
PML, Parsvnath, will be key beneficiaries.
|
|
with
respect to REITs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Deduction
|
Income tax exemption on home
|
Increase exemption limit to
|
Improved affordability will induce
property buyers,
|
|
under
Sec 80-C
|
loan
principal
|
`3.0lakhs
|
thereby
benefitting residential housing segment.
|
|
|
re-payment
up to `1.5 lakh
|
|
Developers
like DLF, Oberoi, Ashiana, Unitech,
|
|
|
|
|
Sobha
will be the key beneficiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAT & DDT exemption
|
Currently MAT charged at 20%;
|
Reduce MAT to 7.5% and
|
This would make SEZ investments
attractive.
|
|
on
SEZs
|
|
remove
DDT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infra status to large
|
No provision
|
Give Infra status to large
|
This would encourage higher
participation of Real
|
|
townships
|
|
townships
|
Estate
Developers, as they could claim benefits
|
|
|
|
|
under
sec-80-IA.
|
TelecomExpected Impact: NeutralThe telecom sector is currently facing a number of challenges on the regulatory front, relating to spectrum allocation, license fee, spectrum charges, tariffs and M&As. We expect Budget 2015-16 to be a non-event for the telecom sector as the National Telecom Policy would be announced soon this year, which will address most of the above mentioned issues. The budget could pencil in the expected revenue to be generated from the upcoming auction of 2G and 3G spectrum, licensing fees, spectrum usage charges and other receipts
(the latest estimates stand at `45,471cr). In FY 2013-2014, the government was able to raise `40,847cr, meeting the target it had set.
The telecom sector is among the heavily taxed sectors in India, attracting various levies such as license fees and spectrum charges. A uniform tax structure would help reduce operational costs, in turn increasing profitability, which is highly important right now for telecom companies, which are facing high interest costs and amortization charges. However, the probability of some announcement in this regard is highly unlikely in this budget.
Overall, we expect Budget to be Neutral for the Telecom sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Wish List
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rationalization
of
|
Currently, the telecom industry
|
Rationalization
of multiple
|
Favorable
for the sector as it will reduce the cost of
|
|
multiple
levies to put a
|
is subject to service tax, license
|
levies
imposed on telecom
|
services.
However, any announcement regarding this is
|
|
simple
industry-friendly
|
fees
and spectrum charges, all
|
sector
|
highly
unlikely in the budget.
|
|
tax
structure.
|
of
which work out to ~35% of
|
|
|
|
|
total
revenue as against
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysia,
Sri Lanka and
|
|
|
|
|
China,
where it is < ~10%.
|
|
|
|
|
Besides,
the state levies
|
|
|
|
|
additional
taxes such as
|
|
|
|
|
Octroi,
VAT, stamp duty and
|
|
|
|
|
entry
tax on towers.
|
|
|
TyresExpected Impact: PositiveThe tyre industry has been suffering from the inverted duty structure wherein customs duty on finished product (tyres) is lower (peak duty of 10%) while the customs duty on raw material (rubber) is at a higher rate of 20%. Also, natural rubber features in the negative list (implying rubber cannot be imported at lower rate under various free trade agreements) whereas tyres are being imported at even lower duty of 0% to 5% under several preferential trade agreements. This has created a double whammy for tyre manufacturers as lower duties have led to surge in imports and the industry cannot fully benefit from
falling international rubber prices. Imports currently constitute about 6% of the overall industry and are prevalent in the commercial vehicle industry.
We expect the government to correct this anomaly and raise peak import duty on tyres to at least 20% (in line with duty on rubber). We also expect tyres to be put in the negative list implying that tyres cannot be imported at lower rate.
Overall, we expect Budget to be positive for the Tyre sector.
Budget Expectations
|
Head
|
Item
|
Current Status
|
Expected Change
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Import
Duty
|
Tyres
|
Charged
at 10%
|
Raised
to 20%
|
Increase
in import duty would be
|
|
|
|
|
|
positive
for domestic tyre companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insertion
in
|
Tyres
|
Exempt
from negative list
|
Insertion
in negative list
|
Addition
of tyres in the negative list
|
|
negative
list
|
|
|
|
would
be positive for domestic tyre
|
|
|
|
|
|
companies
|
Top Picks
|
Company
|
Reco
|
CMP
|
Target Price
|
EPS (`)
|
P/E (x)
|
EV/EBITDA (x)
|
|
|
|
(`)
|
(`)
|
FY2013E
|
FY2014E
|
FY2013E
|
FY2014E
|
FY2013E
|
FY2014E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceat
|
Buy
|
718
|
897
|
81.6
|
89.1
|
8.8
|
8.1
|
5.2
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JK
Tyres
|
Accumulate
|
124
|
140
|
13.9
|
18.6
|
8.9
|
6.7
|
5.3
|
4.7
|
Miscellaneous
|
Budget Expectations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sectors
|
Head
|
Current Status
|
Expected change
|
Potential Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
Reduction
in import
|
10%
import duty as of
|
Considering
falling crude oil
|
Duty
cut on gold imports is expected to
|
|
|
|
duty
|
now
|
prices
and easing current account
|
favour
the Jewellery industry, leading to
|
|
|
|
|
deficit,
we expect a reduction in
|
volume
improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
import
duty by upto 2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plastic
|
Higher import duty
|
5% import duty as of
|
We expect an import duty hike to
|
Increase in duty on finished
imported goods
|
|
|
|
on
Chinese products
|
now
|
upto
15%
|
would
promote domestic manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fertilizer
|
Fertilizer subsidies
|
Currently fertilizer
|
Using Jan Dhan Yojna the
|
The key beneficiaries would be
poor and
|
|
|
|
|
companies
get direct
|
government
is expected to
|
marginal
farmers, which would be good for
|
|
|
|
subsidies
from the
|
implement
direct cash transfer
|
Indian
agriculture.
|
|
|
|
government
|
towards
fertilizer subsidies to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
needy
farmers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logistics
|
Higher fund
|
-
|
-
|
In India, logistics costs are
higher due to
|
|
|
|
allocation
for roads,
|
|
|
poor
infrastructure. An increase in
|
|
|
rail,
ports,
|
|
|
government
spending on infrastructure would
|
|
|
warehouse
etc.
|
|
|
improve
the operating efficiency of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
logistics
sector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Textile
|
Reduction in excise
|
12% excise duty as of
|
Reduction in excise duty to upto
|
Any reduction in excise duty would
boost the
|
|
|
|
duty
on man made
|
now
|
6%
|
growth
of technical textiles which are major
|
|
|
fibres
(MMF) and
|
|
|
consumers
of MMF.
|
|
|
cotton/cotton
fabric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sanitaryware
|
Construction of 11cr
|
-
|
Higher fund allocation
|
Positive for sanitaryware
companies such as
|
|
|
|
toilets
under the
|
|
|
Cera
Sanitaryware, HSIL, etc
|
|
|
‘Swachh
Bharat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abhiyan’
|
|
|
|
|